Evidence Hub

Urinary Tract Infections Among Patients in Primary Healthcare Centres in Bahrain: A cross-sectional study

Mahmood Alawainati, Zahra Ayoob, Eman Almajed, S. Alkhawaja, Noof A. Abdulaal, Rehab Alkhnaizi, Hanin Shaheen, Fatema M. Hubail et al.

Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 2025

1,985 participants

Abstract

Summary Objectives: This study aimed to determine the clinical and microbiological profiles of patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) in primary healthcare centres in Bahrain. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at 27 primary care centres in Bahrain between January and December 2022. All patients with positive urine cultures, defined as the presence of ≥100,000 colony-forming units/mL were included. Participants' sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, risk factors for resistant uropathogens, uropathogen types and antibiotic sensitivity outcomes were assessed. Descriptive and inferential statistics were analysed. Results: A total of 1,985 patients were included, with an average age of 40.57 ± 20.18 years. Most participants were female (n = 1,802, 90.8%) and Bahraini (n = 1,699, 85.6%). Diabetes mellitus (20.1%) and hypertension (17.9%) were the most prevalent comorbidities among the participants. Escherichia coli (n = 1,220, 61.5%) and Klebsiella (n = 342, 17.2%) were the most common uropathogens identified. Nearly 1 in 5 patients had resistant uropathogens (n = 412, 20.8%), with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) uropathogens being the most prevalent (n = 401, 20.2%). Patients with diabetes (P <0.001), hypertension (P <0.001), a history of previous ESBL infections (P <0.001), previous carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (P = 0.019), a history of antibiotic use (P <0.001) and recent hospitalisation (P <0.001) exhibited a higher…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,985 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free