Evidence Hub

P150 - ECE_1744 - Empagliflozin for the treatment of postprandial hypoglycaemia—a randomized placebo-controlled superiority study and meta-analysis

M. Hepprich, Deborah Zeiter, Justus S. Fischer, S. Dobler, Monica La Vista, L. Bally, D. Herzig, M. Cattaneo et al.

European Journal of Endocrinology, 2026

40 participants

Abstract

Postbariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH) significantly impairs quality of life and remains difficult to treat, with current therapies offering limited benefit. Although empagliflozin reduced hypoglycaemic episodes in an acute trial, its longer-term effects on hypoglycaemia and quality of life are unknown. We hypothesised that empagliflozin would reduce hypoglycaemic episodes and improve quality of life in individuals with PBH.

In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 40 adults (18-75 years) with frequent PBH were assigned to empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 28 days. Primary outcomes were changes in SF-36 mental and physical health scores and frequency of hypoglycaemic events measured by blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported symptoms, metabolic measures, and safety. Analyses were performed in the full analysis set with per-protocol sensitivity analyses. A post-hoc random-effects meta-analysis combined these findings with prior studies.

Empagliflozin did not improve physical or mental quality-of-life scores compared with placebo. The number of CGM-detected hypoglycaemic episodes tended to be higher with empagliflozin (P = .054), supported by sensitivity analyses showing an increased risk (incidence rate ratio 1·86, 95% CI 1·07-3·23). Time spent in hypoglycaemia (<3·0 mmol/L) was significantly greater with empagliflozin (0·90% vs 0·40%). Despite this, participants reported fewer symptomatic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free