Evidence Hub

Comparison of Urine Dipstick and Urine Sediment Microscopy With Culture for Diagnosing Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study at Tikur Anbessa Hospital, Ethiopia

Tajudin Adem, D. Shimelis, Tesfaye Negasa, Melkamu Siferih

International Journal of Pediatrics, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Urinary tract infections are common in children, and early diagnosis is crucial to prevent long‐term complications such as renal scarring. While urine culture remains the gold standard, its 24–72‐h turnaround time can delay treatment. To expedite diagnosis, rapid tests such as urine dipstick and microscopy are commonly used, but their reliability in resource‐constrained settings like Ethiopia is uncertain. This study is aimed at comparing the diagnostic performance of these rapid tests with urine culture in pediatric patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free