Evidence Hub

Performance of the World Health Organization (WHO) severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) case definitions in hospitalized children and youth: cross-sectional study

Peter J. Gill, Caitlyn L. Kaziev, H. Mtaweh, Tuana Kant, C. Seaton, Daniel S. Farrar, Hayley Wagman, Mei Han et al.

The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, 2025

1,828 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Respiratory tract infections with viral pathogens are frequently identified using the World Health Organization (WHO) case definition of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI), defined as fever of ≥38°Celsius, cough, onset within 10 days, and hospitalization. While there is extensive research in adults, less is known about the WHO SARI case definition performance in children and youth. We aimed to determine the performance of the WHO SARI and modified case definitions in identifying viral respiratory tract infections in hospitalized children and youth. Methods Retrospective observational cross-sectional study of hospitalized children (0–18 years) with an acute respiratory infection and who received a respiratory viral test at two large Canadian children’s hospitals from July 2022 to June 2023. The WHO SARI and modified SARI case definitions were evaluated overall, by virus and age, with reporting of sensitivity and specificity. Findings There were 2333 hospital admissions, with a median age of 2.4 years (IQR 0.8–5.0). 78% (n = 1828) had one or more viruses identified, most commonly respiratory syncytial virus (30%, n = 709). The WHO SARI definition had a sensitivity of 58% and specificity of 49% for identifying infections with a microbiologically confirmed virus. For Influenza only, the sensitivity was 71% and specificity 44%. The lowest sensitivity was among young children <3 months (28%) and 3 to <6 months (45%). Modified SARI definitions had…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,828 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free