Evidence Hub

Tigecycline-Based Regimens for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: Case Series

C. Niculae, Maria‐Evelina Gorea, Laura-Georgiana Tîrlescu, Raluca-Mihaela Matoru, A. Hristea

Cureus, 2024

5 citations

Abstract

There is existing controversy regarding the efficacy of tigecycline (TG) in treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) because of its pharmacokinetic concerns. We present three patients with cUTIs caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative (GN) pathogens successfully treated with high-dose tigecycline (HDT)-based regimens, as cefiderocol and aztreonam were not available in our country. The first case describes a 67-year-old patient with diabetes, prostate cancer, and double J ureteral stenting who was hospitalized with a febrile, complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). Urine and blood cultures were positive for metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL)-producing extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae (cefiderocol-susceptible). The synergy between TG and colistin using the in vitro E-test was demonstrated, and the patient was started on this regimen using HDT. Clinical and microbiological cures were achieved, and the patient was discharged home. The second case presents a 70-year-old patient with urethral pathology who was hospitalized with the diagnosis of a lower cUTI caused by an MBL-producing pan-drug-resistant (PDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae. The in vitro E-test showed synergy between TG and colistin, and our patient was successfully treated with this HDT-based combination. The third case emphasizes a 63-year-old patient with insulin-dependent diabetes, Child B cirrhosis, and a right double J ureteral stent who was hospitalized with a febrile cUTI. Urine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free