Evidence Hub

Warfare Injuries: A Case Series of Retained Foreign Bodies in the Genitourinary Tract

Liaqat Ali, Shehzad Faiz, Fareeha Afridi, F. Hayat, Sara Kalsoom

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, 2025

14 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To present the management of retained foreign bodies in the genitourinary system resulting from warfare, bomb blasts, and firearm-related injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive case series. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan, from June 2017 to December 2023.

METHODOLOGY

Patients with retained foreign bodies in the genitourinary tract, resulting from previous exposure to bomb blasts, mines, and firearm-related injuries, were included in this study. All patients underwent surgical management. Descriptive statistics were determined for location, duration of retention, type of foreign body, outcome, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

All 14 patients included in the study were male, with a mean age of 30.85 ± 13.38 years. The average indwelling time of these foreign bodies was 33.50 ± 16.34 months, ranging from 10 to 61 months. These foreign bodies were retained in the kidney (n = 5), urinary bladder (n = 4), and testes and ureter (n = 2; each); penis was involved in one case. The extracted foreign bodies were metal pellets (n = 12) and bullets (n = 2). The successful removal of pellets and bullets from kidneys and bladder was achieved endoscopically in nine cases. The mean length of hospital stays for open and endourological procedures was 4.0 ± 1.41 days and 3.5 ± 2.13 days, respectively (p = 0.630). Postoperative complications were reported in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free