Evidence Hub

Post-renal acute kidney injury complicated by urinary tract obstruction due to massive blood clots and severe thrombocytopenia in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: A case report

Y. Fujita, Shuzo Sato, Shuhei Yoshida, T. Asano, Haruki Matsumoto, Jumpei Temmoku, N. Matsuoka, Hiroshi Ohkawara et al.

Modern Rheumatology Case Reports, 2024

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is often seen with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), and these conditions may occur concurrently with severe immune thrombocytopenia and even acute kidney injury (AKI); however, post-renal AKI due to bleeding is uncommon. Here, we describe a case of post-renal AKI and anuria in a patient with SLE and APS, which were attributable to urinary tract obstruction due to massive blood clots caused by secondary immune thrombocytopenia. A 50-year-old Japanese woman was admitted to our hospital with anuria, abdominal tenderness, purpura in the trunk and in both legs, and severe thrombocytopenia. She had been receiving medical treatment for APS and SLE till the age of 45 years. Computed tomography revealed a blood clot without extravasation in both urinary tracts and she was diagnosed with post-renal AKI due to complete obstruction of the urinary system. Additionally, based on her medical history, elevated platelet-associated IgG levels, and increased megakaryocyte count, she was diagnosed with secondary immune thrombocytopenia complicated by SLE and APS. She also had elevated APS-related autoantibodies, including antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin IgM, and IgG. However, concomitant serositis such as lupus enteritis or cystitis was not seen. She was treated with a combination of glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and continuous hemodialysis/hemofiltration, which resulted in rapid improvement of her symptoms and renal dysfunction.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free