Evidence Hub

Safety and Efficacy of D-mannose as Prophylaxis of Urinary Tract Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A. Mutarelli, Carlos Eduardo Franca Vargas, Luis Gustavo Menegardo Siqueira de Oliveira, Acza Kalica Buarque da Silva, Patricia Rocha Barros Vieira, Jiandra da Luz, Luís Santos-Pinto

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2024

534 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection, with over 404.6 million cases and more than 230,000 deaths in 2019. Recurrent UTIs significantly impact quality of life due to symptoms, avoidance of sexual activity, persistent pain, and recurrent antibiotic use. A previous meta-analysis suggested the efficacy of D-mannose for UTI prophylaxis, but recent stronger evidence contradicts these findings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of D-mannose for preventing recurrent UTI. Methods: Inclusion criteria were prospective randomized studies comparing D-mannose with control or antibiotics in high-risk populations for recurrent UTIs. We excluded abstracts, multi-interventional treatments including D-mannose, and studies using D-mannose for current UTI treatment rather than prophylaxis. The primary outcome was recurrent UTI, analyzed using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library, identifying 958 articles and abstracts, with 853 remaining after deduplication. We selected 34 for full-text review and included 6 studies. These studies involved 534 patients treated with D-mannose, of whom 521 (97.6%) were women. D-mannose was not associated with a reduction in recurrent UTI compared to control (RR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.28-1.16; p< 0.01) or antibiotics (RR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.12-1.25; p< 0.01). Further analyses showed D-mannose did not reduce time to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 534 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free