Evidence Hub

Characteristics and risk factors for infection in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Wenxuan Luo, Can Liu, Lei Zhang, Jie Tang, Jie Chen, Yanzao Zhao, Xuemei Huang, Xiaoli Zheng et al.

Autoimmunity Reviews, 2024

5,343 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the characteristics and risk factors for infection in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles from database inception to November 2023. The prevalence, odds ratio (OR), and mean difference (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies with 5343 patients with AAV were included, of whom 2890 patients experienced an infection. The pooled prevalence was 54.6 % (95 % CI, 48.4 % to 61.1 %) for all infections and 35.8 % (95 % CI, 31.0 % to 40.8 %) for severe infections; and prevalence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, aspergillosis, candidiasis, cryptococcosis, herpes zoster, cytomegalovirus, and specific bacterial infections were pooled. The respiratory system was the most common infection site, followed by blood, urinary tract, skin and soft tissue, and digestive infections. Risk factors for infection included older age, end-stage renal disease, dialysis, diabetes, smoking, kidney and lung involvement, leukopenia; higher Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score, and serum creatinine and C-reactive protein levels; and lower hemoglobin levels, and platelet and CD4 counts. In addition, use of cyclophosphamide, steroid pulse therapy, plasma exchange, and higher initial glucocorticoid dose were associated with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,343 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free