Evidence Hub

Practice of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention and Associated Factors Among Nurses in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yirgalem Abere, Astewle Andargie Baye, Yeshiambaw Eshetie, Abraham Tsedalu Amare, Gebrie Kassaw Yirga, Rahel Mulatie Anteneh, K. M. Kebede, Bekalu Mekonen Belay et al.

SAGE Open Nursing, 2026

Abstract

Background Among the most prevalent illnesses linked to healthcare, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) dramatically raise hospital stays, morbidity, death, and medical expenses. Following evidence-based recommendations is essential for effective CAUTI prevention, and nurses are essential in putting preventive measures into action. Objective This study aimed to assess the level of CAUTI prevention practices and associated factors among nurses in Ethiopia. Methods A thorough search was carried out across multiple databases to identify important publications. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) technique intended for cross-sectional research was used to evaluate the quality and efficacy of each original study. Included were observational studies looking at Ethiopian nurses’ CAUTI preventive practices with a search period ending on February 9, 2025. A random-effects model was utilized for pooling estimates, and Stata software was utilized for analysis. The I2 statistic was used to look for heterogeneity across the studies. Results The pooled estimate of CAUTI prevention practice among nurses in Ethiopia was 51% (95% CI: 45.02, 56.97). A total of seven studies were included, with a combined sample size of 2,669 nurses. Work experience (AOR = 4.37, 95% CI: 3.05, 5.68), knowledge (AOR = 4.5, 95% CI: 2.04, 6.97), training (AOR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.74, 2.36), positive attitude (AOR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.89, 3.40), and availability of CAUTI prevention guidelines (AOR =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free