Evidence Hub

Impact of heart failure medications on cognitive function: A systematic review

Jahangiri S, Kazakov E, Amancherla S, Kalogeropoulos AP

European journal of clinical investigation, 2025

112,357 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) often coexists with cognitive impairment and accelerates cognitive decline. However, the impact of HF medications on cognition has received limited attention. This review evaluates the evidence on the cognitive effects of currently recommended medication classes for HF.

METHODS: Systematic review using PubMed and EMBASE following PRISMA guidelines, employing keywords related to HF, cognitive function and guideline-recommended HF medications. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) or cohort studies assessing cognitive function in adult HF patients.

RESULTS: Three cohort studies on ACEi/ARBs (N = 5080; 2 prospective, 1 retrospective) reported no significant impact on cognitive function to higher cognitive scores with ACEi/ARBs. Eight studies on sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI, N = 42,143; all observational studies or post-hoc analyses of RCT) found either no effect on cognitive function or reduced risk of new-onset dementia and improved cognitive outcomes with ARNI. Beta-blockers (N = 40; 1 RCT) lacked significant cognitive effects; empagliflozin (SGLT2i, N = 162; 1 prospective) improved cognitive performance in patients with diabetes and HF with preserved ejection fraction; digoxin (N = 1172; 1 retrospective) was associated with enhanced cognitive function; and statins (N = 112,357; 2 retrospective), which are indicated in HF of ischemic aetiology, were not associated with a significant effect on cognition.

CONCLUSIONS:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 112,357 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free