Evidence Hub

Breaking the cycle of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: a network meta-analysis of superior preventive measures

Revina Maharani, Satria Rafi Ratmandhika, Yehezkiel Gian Pradipta Pahu, Jesphine Arbi Wijaya, M. V. Anggarkusuma, B. Daryanto

Urogynaecologia, 2025

Abstract

Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI) impose a substantial burden, particularly on vulnerable populations, such as women. The importance of effective prevention strategies is crucial in reducing the incidence of rUTI. While various preventive measures are available, there remains a gap in knowledge regarding their effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. This study aims to evaluate various interventions’ performance in reducing the risk of rUTI and safety compared to placebo in healthy women. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted according to the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses NMA Checklist. A systematic search was performed in Scopus, PubMed, CENTRAL, EBSCO, Hindawi, and ProQuest up to June 14th, 2024. Studies that met our eligibility criteria are qualitatively assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2. Data analysis was conducted using Rstudio v.4.3.1 with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. The p-value was calculated to rank treatments. There were 6325 samples obtained from 40 journals. Fosfomycin-trometamol is the best intervention in preventing rUTI in women [p=0.9965; relative risk (RR)=0.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.17]. Cranberry extract (p=0.62; RR=0.38; 95% CI 0.24-0.60) and nitrofurantoin (p=0.617; RR=0.38; 95% CI 0.27-0.53) have the most evidence with acceptable RR. Combinations of lactobacillus, cranberry, and D-mannose resulted in the lowest…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free