Evidence Hub

P-24. Seven Versus Fourteen Days of Antibiotics for Gram-Negative Bacteremia from a Urinary Tract Source:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Graciela Luna, Andrea rodriguez Jimenez, Chidozie Igbonagwam, Zein Barakat, Zoya Khan, Daniela Carralero Somoza, G. Snyder, Imad Dibo et al.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2026

4,448 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for gram-negative bacteremia sourced from urinary tract infections (UTI) remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing short-course (approximately 7 days) versus prolonged-course (approximately 14 days) antibiotic therapy in this population.Figure 1: Forest plot of outcomesTable 1: Study design Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov through April 26, 2025. Studies were included if they compared 7-day versus 14-day antibiotic therapy in gram-negative bacteremia with ≥65% UTI source or performed a dedicated UTI subgroup analysis. Outcomes assessed included 30- and 90-day mortality and recurrence rates. Risk ratios (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model. Noninferiority was assessed using a prespecified margin of RR 1.25, and superiority was assessed with a threshold of RR < 1.00. Results Six studies (three randomized trials, three observational cohorts) encompassing 4,448 patients were included. There were no significant differences between short- and prolonged-course therapy for 30-day mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.64–1.47; p=0.90), 30-day recurrence (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.80–2.37; p=0.24), 90-day mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77–1.06; p=0.20), or 90-day recurrence (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.45–1.01; p=0.06). Conclusion Our findings suggest that a 7-day course may be sufficient for most patients with UTI-sourced gram-negative bacteremia. Disclosures All…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,448 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free