Evidence Hub

The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mortality in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tara Reshadmanesh, Reza Mohebi, A. Behnoush, Azadeh Reshadmanesh, Amirmohammad Khalaji, Mitra Norouzi, Elmira Javanmardi, Reza Pishdad et al.

Cardio-Oncology, 2025

88,096 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on reducing cardiovascular events in different subgroups of diabetic patients are under investigation. The current systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on preventing cardiovascular events and mortality and their adverse events in patients with active cancer and diabetes undergoing cardiotoxic cancer treatment. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus to find studies investigating the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on patients with diabetes and confirmed cancer until 19 August 2024. Meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effects model to compare all-cause mortality, cancer-associated mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, arrhythmia, and adverse event rates such as ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia, urinary tract infection, and sepsis between patients with or without SGLT2 inhibitors use. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare outcomes between SGLT2 inhibitors and non-SGLT2 inhibitors groups. Eleven studies were included with 88,096 patients with confirmed cancer (49% male). Among the total population, 20,538 received SGLT2 inhibitors (age 61.68 ± 10.71), while 67,558 did not receive SGLT2 inhibitors (age 68.24 ± 9.48). The meta-analysis found that the patients who received SGLT2 inhibitors had a significantly lower mortality rate than those who did not receive SGLT2 inhibitors (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.63, p-value…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 88,096 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free