Evidence Hub

Prevalence and incidence of infections among people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xue-Lei Fu, Wen-Jun Chen, Hui Zhao, Mengdi Li, Meng-Yi Zhuang, Yang Xiao, Bei Wu, Jia Guo

Journal of Global Health, 2026

Abstract

Background Although evidence suggests a greater susceptibility of type 2 diabetes to infections, the prevalence and incidence of different types of infections vary greatly, affecting clinical decision-making. We aimed to estimate the aggregate prevalence and incidence of infections among people with type 2 diabetes. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to August 2025. We combined the terms type 2 diabetes, infection, and prevalence/incidence for the search. We included studies with data on infection prevalence (percentage) and/or incidence (number of person-years at risk) among patients with type 2 diabetes. We used the quality-effects model to estimate effects and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results We included 70 studies in this meta-analysis. Severe periodontitis had the highest pooled prevalence among people with type 2 diabetes (33.6%; 95% CI = 23.7–44.2), followed by skin infections (28.6%; 95% CI = 20.7–37.2) and urinary tract infections (9.7%; 95% CI = 6.5–13.5). Lower respiratory tract infections had the highest pooled incidence per 10 000 person-years (1409.2; 95% CI = 1048.1–1894.6), followed by skin infections (664.1; 95% CI = 39.4–11203.9), upper respiratory tract infections (553.6; 95% CI = 12.7–24149.2) and urinary tract infections (500.6; 95% CI = 171.3–1462.6). Conclusions Among people with type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of severe periodontitis and the incidence of lower respiratory tract infections…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free