Evidence Hub

Epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and microbiology of suppurative pyelonephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, part 1

N. V, A. V, A. V.

Urologiia, 2025

10,000 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The first part of a systematic review and meta-analysis addressing the problem of purulent pyelonephritis is presented in the article.

AIM

To analyze the epidemiology, predisposing factors, diagnostic approaches, and microbiological characteristics of purulent pyelonephritis, which is a complicated form of acute pyelonephritis characterized by renal parenchymal suppuration, sepsis, or localized abscess.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of 46 studies (1981-2024) on complicated pyelonephritis was performed. The review included clinical series (observational and one randomized trial) with more or equal 10 patients reporting on prevalence, risk factors, clinical course, diagnostic approaches, microbiology, treatment, and outcomes of severe pyelonephritis. Data were synthesized qualitatively, and a meta-analysis of key outcomes (mortality and need for surgical intervention) was carried out using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Acute pyelonephritis is one of the most common serious urinary tract infections, with an annual incidence of 15-17 per 10,000 women and 3-5 per 10,000 men. In most cases, the disease responds well to antibiotic therapy; however, in 20-30% of patients complicated pyelonephritis develops. Predisposing factors include diabetes mellitus, urinary tract obstruction, advanced age, male sex, immunodeficiency, and pregnancy. Diabetes mellitus is present in 30-35% of hospitalized patients with pyelonephritis (vs. 10-15% in uncomplicated cases)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 10,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free