Evidence Hub

Burden and Genomic Landscape of Antimicrobial Resistance in Non-Bloodstream Infections Among Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

E. Paintsil, C. Ozdemir, T. Paul, K. Egoh, J. Wanford, D. Shawcross

medRxiv, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Background: Patients with cirrhosis are highly susceptible to infections due to immune dysfunction and gut barrier impairment. Non-bloodstream infections frequently trigger decompensation and mortality, yet the global distribution of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in these infections is poorly characterized. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting AMR in non-bloodstream bacterial infections among patients with cirrhosis. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to 15 September 2025. Pooled prevalence estimates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and key resistant pathogens were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed by country income, continent, and bacterial species. Results: Thirty-one studies including 3,162 infections were analysed. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis predominated (79%), followed by colonisation (12%) and urinary tract infections (7%). Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 60% of infections (Escherichia coli 29%, Klebsiella pneumoniae 11%), while Gram-positive pathogens represented 39% (Enterococcus spp. 14%, Staphylococcus aureus 6%). Overall pooled MDR prevalence was 29%, with higher burdens in lower-middle-income countries (MDR 47% vs. 22-41%; ESBL 24% vs. 10%; VRE 21% vs. 3%; CRE 32% vs. 1%). Genotypic data identified 436 resistance genes with marked continental differences. Conclusion: Cirrhosis-associated non-bloodstream infections are dominated by Gram-negative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free