Evidence Hub

Enhancing predictive accuracy for urinary tract infections post-pediatric pyeloplasty with explainable AI: an ensemble TabNet approach

Hongyan Wang, Junpeng Ding, Shuochen Wang, Long Li, Jinqiu Song, Dong-Sheng Bai

Scientific Reports, 2025

764 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a common pediatric condition often treated with pyeloplasty. Despite the surgical intervention, postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs) occur in over 30% of cases within six months, adversely affecting recovery and increasing both clinical and economic burdens. Current prediction methods for postoperative UTIs rely on empirical judgment and limited clinical parameters, underscoring the need for a robust, multifactorial predictive model. We retrospectively analyzed data from 764 pediatric patients who underwent unilateral pyeloplasty at the Children’s Hospital affiliated with the Capital Institute of Pediatrics between January 2012 and January 2023. A total of 25 clinical features were extracted, including patient demographics, medical history, surgical details, and various postoperative indicators. Feature engineering was initially performed, followed by a comparative analysis of five machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, SVM, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM) and the deep learning TabNet model. This comparison highlighted the respective strengths and limitations of traditional machine learning versus deep learning approaches. Building on these findings, we developed an ensemble learning model, meta-learner, that effectively integrates both methodologies, and utilized SHAP(Shapley Additive Explanation, SHAP) to complete the visualization of the integrated black-box model. Among the 764 pediatric pyeloplasty…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 764 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free