Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Heart Failure in Children and Adolescents: A Single-Arm and Pairwise Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with GRADE Assessment of the Evidence

Leen Adel Aldossary, Raghad Mamdouh Alanazi, Rana M. Almutairi, Tayba A. Mugibel, Karen Deaa Ghanam, Robaiya Awadh Robaiya Ben-Obaidellah, Khloud Awadh Mohammed, Asrar A. Alharbi et al.

Cardiology in Review, 2026

599 participants

Abstract

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a cornerstone of adult heart failure (HF) therapy and are increasingly prescribed off-label to children, yet pediatric outcomes have never been pooled. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science to 14 August 2026 for studies of any SGLT2 inhibitor in children or adolescents with HF and performed a single-arm meta-analysis of all exposed patients and a pairwise meta-analysis of the comparative studies with random-effects models. Nine studies contributed 599 exposed patients and 97 controls. Pooled rates were 3.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-8.4) for mortality, 8.5% (6.2-11.5) for transplantation, 11.2% (8.2-15.1) for worsening HF, 0.2% (0.03-1.6) for ketoacidosis, 4.5% (1.2-14.9) for acute kidney injury, 3.7% (1.1-11.7) for urinary tract infection, and 4.1% (1.4-11.2) for discontinuation because of an adverse event. After initiation, left ventricular ejection fraction rose by 7.7 percentage points (3.6-11.8) and natriuretic peptide fell by 0.42 standard deviations (0.34-0.49). In the comparative synthesis (63 exposed, 97 unexposed), risk ratios were 0.80 (0.11-6.07) for mortality and 0.21 (0.03-1.68) for worsening HF; ejection fraction improved 3.34 percentage points more with SGLT2 inhibitors (0.22-6.46) whereas natriuretic peptide did not differ (standardized mean difference -0.09, -0.50 to 0.33).

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 599 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free