Evidence Hub

Prognostic factors of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chu Qin, Dieyu Ma, Lisha Pang, Ma-Hong Hu, Sisi Lin, Zhi-Zhen Zhou, Xiu-Juan Xu, Conghua Ji

BMC Infectious Diseases, 2025

12 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically identify and evaluate prognostic risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis through a meta-analysis. Chinese and English databases were comprehensively searched from the start of the study to January 2025. Observational studies reporting multi-variable adjusted risk ratios (HRS) for prognostic factors of sepsis in adults were included. Data extraction and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1, and effect estimates were summarized using fixed or random effects models based on heterogeneity. Twenty studies involving 69 potential factors were included. A meta-analysis was performed on 15 factors. Increase in age (HR: 1.01), acute kidney injury (HR: 1.48), cancer (HR: 1.21), liver disease (HR: 1.58), septic shock (HR: 2.22), APACHE II (HR: 1.06), SOFA (HR: 1.19), SAPS II score (HR: 1.02), lactate (HR: 1.07) and red blood cell distribution width (HR: 1.07) were significant risk factors. Diabetes (HR: 0.80) and urinary tract infection (HR: 0.47) were protective factors. A high degree of heterogeneity was observed in some factors. Multiple factors have a significant impact on the mortality of sepsis. Early identification of these risk factors can guide clinical intervention strategies and improve patient outcomes.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free