Evidence Hub

Cardiorenal Outcomes in the CANVAS, DECLARE-TIMI 58, and EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trials: A Systematic Review

Kluger AY, Tecson KM, Barbin CM, Lee AY, Lerma EV, Rosol ZP, Rangaswami J, Lepor NE et al.

Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2018

77 citations

Abstract

In this systematic review, we sought to summarize the 3 recent sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) trials (Dapagliflozin Effect on CardiovasculAR Events (DECLARE-TIMI 58), Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assess-ment Study (CANVAS) Program, and Empagliflozin, Car-diovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes (EMPA-REG OUTCOME)) and to explore the potential causes for their different results. We found that the major adverse cardiovascular event rates per 1000 patient-years for drug and placebo, as well as the corresponding rela-tive risk reductions, were 22.6, 24.2, 7%; 26.9, 31.5, 14%; 37.4, 43.9, 14% for DECLARE-TIMI 58, CAN-VAS, and EMPA-REG OUTCOME, respectively. DECLARE-TIMI 58 had the fewest cardiorenal events (across treat-ment and control arms) and EMPA-REG OUTCOME the most. DECLARE-TIMI 58 used alternative inclusion crite-rion for baseline renal function (creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min) compared to the other trials (estimated glomeru-lar filtration rate (eGFR) > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 body-surface area). Therefore, the DECLARE-TIMI 58 study co-hort had higher eGFR (mean eGFR 85.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to 76.5 and 74 in CANVAS and EMPA-REG OUTCOME, respectively); this may have caused the difference in results. Additionally contributing to the high event rate in EMPA-REG OUTCOME was the requirement of prior confirmed cardiovascular disease (CVD), resulting in 99.2% of patients with CVD compared to only 65.6%and 40.6% in CANVAS and DECLARE-TIMI 58,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free