Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Ahmed M, Jain H, Javaid H, Ahsan A, Szilagyi S, Ahmad A, Ahmed R

Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2024

11,211 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with or without Type 2 diabetes and heart failure (HF). However, studies have shown conflicting evidence regarding their efficacy in patients following acute myocardial infarction (MI). We conducted a pilot systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in MI.

METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Embase databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared clinical outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo following MI. We conducted the statistical analysis using RevMan, version 5.4 and pooled risk ratios (RRs) along the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for all outcomes.

RESULTS: Five RCTs reporting data for 11,211 patients were included in our study. The mean follow-up duration was 43.8 weeks. Our pooled analysis showed that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of hospitalisations for heart failure (HHF) (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88, p = 0.001) in patients with MI. However, the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.78-1.41, p = 0.76), CV mortality (RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.84-1.29, p = 0.73) and all-cause hospitalisations (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.96-1.17, p = 0.25) remained comparable across the two groups.

CONCLUSION: SGLT2 inhibitors reduce HHF without affecting all-cause mortality,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 11,211 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free