Evidence Hub

Renal protective effect and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis and systematic review

Lin J, Wang S, Wen T, Zhang X

International urology and nephrology, 2022

12 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: A network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the renal protective effect and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched by two authors using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool.

RESULTS: Compared with controls, luseogliflozin 2.5 mg (MD = - 3.50, 95% CI - 6.65 to - 0.35), bexagliflozin 20 mg (MD = - 3.48, 95% CI - 6.57 to - 0.39), and dapagliflozin 10 mg (MD = - 3.08, 95% CI - 5.09 to - 1.06) reduced the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Empagliflozin 25 mg (MD = - 240.43, 95% CI - 414.13 to - 66.73), dapagliflozin 10 mg (MD = - 94.15, 95% CI - 111.72 to - 76.59), and canagliflozin 100 mg (MD = - 193.25, 95% CI - 279.16 to - 107.34) reduced urine albumin-creatinine ratio levels compared with controls. Empagliflozin 25 mg, canagliflozin 100 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg induced a significant decline in urine albumin-creatinine ratio compared to dapagliflozin 5 mg. In terms of safety, ertugliflozin 5 mg reduced the risk of urinary tract infection. Compared with controls, empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg, and canagliflozin 100 mg reduced the risk of any adverse events while canagliflozin 100 mg reduced the risk of serious adverse events. Dapagliflozin 10 mg had a lower risk of treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors have favourable renal protective effect…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free