A Phase 2, Open-Label Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Lansoprazole to That of Oral Lansoprazole in Subjects With Erosive Esophagitis
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacodynamics of intravenous (IV) lansoprazole to oral lansoprazole capsules, once daily (QD), in participants with erosive esophagitis.
Conditions: Esophagitis, Reflux.
Primary outcome: Maximal Acid Output obtained 22 hours after the last dose of IV lansoprazole compared to the Maximal Acid Output obtained 22 hours after the last dose of oral lansoprazole following pentagastrin stimulation in both instances..
Enrollment: 68 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 68 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study
- A new aging measure captures morbidity and mortality risk across diverse subpopulations from NHANES IV: A cohort study
- Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study
- Are noise and air pollution related to the incidence of dementia? A cohort study in London, England
- Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS-CoV-2 positive children — a nationwide cohort study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.