Evidence Hub

The Association Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

O. Abureesh, Walid Sange, Qusai Al Zureikat, Toni Habib, Mohammad Abu-Shaban, Ghaith Rababah, Yousef Yousef, Ahmad M. Abdulraheem et al.

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2026

2,900,965 participants

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common problem that affects patients. The constant irritation of the esophageal mucosa, in addition to the potential aspiration, has been suggested as a predisposing factor for lung cancer (LC). This study aims to investigate the association between GERD and LC. Methods: An electronic search was conducted on EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases from inception through November 2025. Studies evaluating the association between GERD and lung cancer in adult populations were included. Reviews, non-English articles, pediatric studies, and non-human studies were excluded. Twelve studies involving 2,900,965 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three types of common and random effect meta-analyses were utilized, namely meta-analysis of proportion, log(HR) and log(OR) models. Included studies were examined for risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Results: Twelve articles describing 2,900,965 patients were found to be fit for inclusion. Male and female sexes were equally represented. On average, patients were 57.67 ± 10.02 years of age. Pooled proportion of co-occurring LC and GERD in patients was estimated at 64% [95% C.I.: 15–95%; p = 0.02], with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 96.8%, p < 0.01). Among studies calculating for hazard ratio (HR), an estimated pooled log(HR) of 1.01 [95% C.I.: 0.36–2.8; p = 0.98] with significant data heterogeneity (I2 = 88%, p < 0.01) was found. In comparison, five studies included…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,900,965 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free