Evidence Hub

Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Russia: a meta-analysis of population-based studies

D. N. Andreev, I. Maev, D. Bordin, S. Abdulkhakov, R. Shaburov, P. Sokolov

Терапевтический архив, 2024

34,192 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

AIM

To systematize data on the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the adult population of Russia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The search for studies was conducted in the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and RSCI (Russian Science Citation Index) from January 2000 to December 2022. The review included relevant publications in peer-reviewed periodicals in English or Russian, publications with data from cross-sectional epidemiological studies assessing the prevalence of GERD in the Russian population, studies on adult patients with GERD, and publications with detailed descriptive statistics that allow using the data in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 6 studies involving 34,192 subjects. The overall prevalence of GERD (prevalence of heartburn ± regurgitation once a week or more frequently) in the analyzed studies was 25.605% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.913-34.147). The analysis used a random effect model, as there was significant heterogeneity between the results in both groups (I2=99.63%; p<0.0001). The overall mean age of GERD patients in the study population was 48.14 (95% CI 32.25-4.03) years. The prevalence of GERD in the male population was 23.653% (95% CI 13.351-35.832) and 25.457% (95% CI 17.094-34.849) in females.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that GERD is a common esophageal disease in the Russian population, affecting approximately one in four country residents.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 34,192 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free