Evidence Hub

Esophageal Motility Outcome after Nissen Fundoplication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hesham M. HASAN, MD.; Amr M.M. OMAR H.F. KHALAFALLA, M.Sc.

The Medical journal of Cairo University, 2024

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very prevalent disease. The Montreal consensus conference in 2006 defined GERD as "a condition which develops when the re-flux of gastric contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications". The pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial and complex but revolves around an incompetent esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) as an anti-reflux barrier, in the form of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESR) and/ or a hypotensive EGJ. Aim of Study: To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic surgeries with regard to esophageal motility and determine a clear indication for these interventions. Additionally, we will compare between preoperative and postoperative manometer results. Patients and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by careful following of the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews interventions and the results were described according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free