Evidence Hub

Clinical Advances in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic and Mechanistic Evidence

Parizad R, Hatwal J, Taban Sadeghi M, Brar A, Desai R, Batta A, Mohan B

Vascular health and risk management, 2026

6 citations

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has emerged as the predominant of heart failure (HF), particularly among aging populations and individuals with a high burden of comorbidities. Its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are complex, multifactorial and, heterogeneous.

Objective: This systematic review aims to synthesize contemporary evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic strategies for HFpEF, with especially emphasis on emerging clinical approaches and future research directions.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering publications from January 2015 through June 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational cohort studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and current clinical guidelines talking key aspects of HFpEF.

Results: HFpEF now accounts for more than 50% of all HF diagnoses worldwide. Although it shares overlapping clinical features with other cardiovascular (CV) and systemic disorders, recent advances in echocardiographic techniques and the use of circulating biomarkers have substantially improved diagnostic accuracy. Current management strategies primarily focus on comorbidity control, optimization of volume status, structured exercise and rehabilitation programs, and the adoption of novel pharmacological therapies, most notably sodium glucose…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free