Evidence Hub

Impact of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Individuals with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

S. Syropoulos, Maria Moutzouri, E. Grammatopoulou, I. Patsaki

Methods and Protocols, 2026

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic condition mainly caused by the dysfunction of the antireflux mechanism at the gastroesophageal junction. This is composed of the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm. Increasing evidence suggests that diaphragmatic dysfunction and reduced inspiratory muscle strength may contribute to the persistence of GERD symptoms. Although respiratory physiotherapy has shown beneficial effects, the role of a structured inspiratory muscle training (IMT) program has not been sufficiently examined. This study aims to investigate the effects of an inspiratory muscle training program on inspiratory muscle strength and secondary clinical outcomes in individuals with GERD. A total of thirty adults with a confirmed GERD diagnosis will be enrolled in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. These volunteers will be randomly assigned either to the experimental group, which will undergo a 3-month inspiratory muscle training (IMT) using tapered flow resistive loading at 40% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), or to the control group, which will receive sham IMT with a consistent low resistance. Primary outcomes will include maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal dynamic inspiratory pressure (S-index). Secondary outcomes will assess GERD symptoms, disease-related quality of life, and pulmonary function. Measurements will be performed at baseline, at three months of intervention, and at six months from recruitment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free