Evidence Hub

The preventive effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

Yang Q, Wang C, Wang W, Li Y, Dang Y

Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025

28,712 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) can exacerbate renal dysfunction, which in turn increases the onset of AF or AFL. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been proven to have cardiac and renal protective effects. The meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether SGLT2i can reduce the risk of AF/AFL in patients with CKD.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials.gov were searched up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing of SGLT2i and placebo on AF/AFL in patients with CKD were included. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated in the overall population and selected subgroups.

Results: 10 RCTs involving 28,712 patients were included. SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of the composite events of AF and AFL in patients with CKD (0.65% vs. 0.91%; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.95, P = 0.02) in overall population, but did not reduce the risk of AF (0.56% vs. 0.75%; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.01, P = 0.06) or AFL (0.097% vs. 0.17%; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.30-1.13, P = 0.11). Subgroup analysis based on sample size and follow-up duration showed that SGLT2i reduced the risk of AF in trials with sample size more than 1,000 and follow-up duration longer than 2 years (0.59% vs. 0.80%; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99, P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis based on different populations showed that SGLT2i reduced the risk of AF in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 28,712 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free