The Discrepancy Between Subjective and Objective Clinical Endpoints in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Abstract
Therapeutic outcome in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly determined by both subjective and objective clinical endpoints. Clinicians frequently use symptom improvement as a key benchmark of clinical success, in conjunction with normalization of objective parameters such as esophageal acid exposure and inflammation. However, GERD therapeutic trials have demonstrated that a substantial number of patients rendered asymptomatic, whether through medical, surgical, or endoscopic intervention, continue to have persistent abnormal esophageal acid exposure and erosive esophagitis. The opposite has also been demonstrated in therapeutic trials, where patients remained symptomatic despite normalization of esophageal acid exposure and complete resolution of esophageal inflammation. Moreover, there is no substantive evidence that symptomatic response to antireflux treatment requires complete esophageal mucosal healing or normalization of esophageal acid exposure. Thus, it appears that a certain level of improvement in objective parameters is needed to translate into meaningful changes in symptoms and health-related quality of life of GERD patients. This supports the need to reconsider the commonly used “hard” clinical endpoints to evaluate therapeutic trials in GERD.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Long-term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use
- Ivth brazilian consensus conference on helicobacter pylori infection
- A pSMAD/CDX2 complex is essential for the intestinalization of epithelial metaplasia
- S2k-Leitlinie Gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit und eosinophile Ösophagitis der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) – März 2023 – AWMF-Registernummer: 021–013
- Step-by-step management of refractory gastresophageal reflux disease
- Insights into Effects/Risks of Chronic Hypergastrinemia and Lifelong PPI Treatment in Man Based on Studies of Patients with Zollinger–Ellison Syndrome
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.