Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Early Initiation of Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Dutta D, Nagendra L, Kamrul-Hasan A, Mahajan K

TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology, 2025

7,409 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are the preferred agents for managing type 2 diabetes in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and for reducing hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in patients with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. We undertook this meta-analysis, as, to date, no meta-analysis has holistically analysed the potential benefits and safety of SGLT2i in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with MI who received SGLT2i in the intervention arm (initiated within 2 weeks of the index event) and placebo/active comparator in the control arm. The primary outcome was to evaluate the impact on cardiovascular death, all-cause death and HHF. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the impact on echocardiographic parameters, N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, MI, stroke, all-cause hospitalization and safety issues.

Results: From initially screened 8,922 articles, data from 6 RCTs were analysed (7,409 patients). Early initiation of SGLT2i following MI was associated with significantly lower future HHF (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-0.90; p=0.002; I 2=0%) and significantly higher left-ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference [MD]: 1.65%; 95% CI: 0.34-2.96; p=0.01; I 2=0%) compared with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,409 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free