Evidence Hub

A retrospective study assessing RefluxStop surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Clinical outcomes in 79 patients from Germany

Thorsten Lehmann, M. Šimkus, Christoph Oehler

Surgery Open Science, 2024

79 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Background This study reports outcomes of the RefluxStop procedure treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in clinical practice at a high-volume regional hospital in Germany. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 79 patients with chronic GERD that underwent the RefluxStop procedure, comprising high mediastinal dissection, loose cruroplasty, esophagogastroplication between vagal trunks, and fundus invagination of the RefluxStop implant. The primary outcome was GERD Health-Related Quality-of-Life (GERD-HRQL) score and improvement from baseline. Secondary outcomes included proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and intra- and postoperative complications, including dysphagia, esophageal dilatation, and reoperation. Results Baseline characteristics (n = 79) included large hiatal hernia >3 cm (32.4 %) and previous antireflux surgery (20.3 %). At mean (SD) follow-up of 11 (4.4) months ranging from 4 to 19 months, the median (IQR) and mean (SD) improvements in GERD-HRQL score were 100 % (90.2–100 %) and 92.4 % (13.9 %) from baseline, respectively. Significant reduction in PPI use was observed from a baseline of 94.9 % to 2.5 % at follow-up. All cases of preoperative dysphagia (7.6 %) completely resolved. New-onset, mild dysphagia occurred in one subject (1.3 %) at final follow-up. One subject (1.3 %) experienced asymptomatic device migration into the stomach, likely due to surgical technique with a much too tight invagination, with subsequent conversion to Toupet…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 79 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free