Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review and Expert Evaluation of Perioperative SGLT2 Inhibitor-Associated Ketoacidosis Case Reports

Snel LIP, Li X, Jamaludin F, Siegelaar SE, Holleman F, Vriesendorp TM, DeVries JH, Hoekstra JBL et al.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026

115 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the perioperative setting may lead to SGLT2i-associated postoperative ketoacidosis (SAPKA) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Therefore, cessation of this drug is recommended before surgery. We aimed to study reported cases to assess the causality of SGLT2i, identify common characteristics, potential risk factors, treatment and outcomes of SAPKA.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search to identify case reports of patients with metabolic acidosis and the presence of ketones who used SGLT2i in the perioperative setting. Case reports were summarised for common characteristics, assessed for quality and distributed to a panel of diabetes experts, who evaluated the likelihood of SAPKA using a questionnaire.

Results: Ninety-three papers containing 128 case reports fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The expert panel found SAPKA to be 'likely' in 53 (41%), 'possible' in 38 (30%) and 'unlikely' in 27 (21%) cases; 10 cases (8%) could not be validated due to insufficient data or implausible timing. SAPKA was therefore considered likely or possible in 71% (91/128) of cases. Common factors identified in the SAPKA reports included a diagnosis of T2D mellitus (n = 115), impaired perioperative intake (n = 30) and insufficient insulin supplementation (n = 10). Treatment with insulin was effective, and ketoacidosis resolved in all surviving patients, although significant morbidity, including ICU…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 115 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free