Evidence Hub

A commentary on ‘Intraoperative endomanometric laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication improves postoperative outcomes in large sliding hiatus hernias with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease: a retrospective cohort study’

Tingfen Han, Shuai Liu, Xiasang Qiu

International Journal of Surgery, 2024

Abstract

Gastroesophageal re fl ux disease (GERD) is a disease that occurs in the esophagus or beyond due to the re fl ux of gastric contents [1] . Esophageal hiatal hernia, most commonly type I sliding hiatal hernia (HH), is one of the leading causes of GERD [2] . Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is currently recognized as the preferred surgery for the treatment of GERD [3] . Habeeb et al . [4] conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study designed to assess the impact of intraoperative endoscopy and intraoperative manometry in improving prognosis after LNF. The authors clearly de fi ned the concepts of severe GERD (DeMeester score > 100) and large sliding hiatal hernias (HHs) ( > 5 cm). The design of this study, which focused on the intraoperative use of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and endoscopy to improve surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction, is commendable as it attempts a less-explored area in GERD. However, there are still some limitations:

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free