Evidence Hub

The effects of empagliflozin on ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: a systematic review

M. Hunjul, M. Rakab, K. M. G. Mohammed, A. Shubietah, A. Nazir, B. Hatem Elsalakawi, H. Munshi, A. Abu-Shanab et al.

European Heart Journal, 2025

463 participants

Abstract

Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, has demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in heart failure (HF), but its effects on ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies remain unclear. This systematic review evaluates the impact of empagliflozin on VA burden and ICD-related outcomes in HF patients.

A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing empagliflozin in HF patients with ICDs. Primary outcomes included ventricular arrhythmia episodes, appropriate ICD shocks, and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy.

Four studies (three RCTs, one retrospective) comprising 463 HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were included. The EMPA-ICD trial (n=118) reported a 35% reduction in VA episodes over 24 weeks, with 18% of empagliflozin-treated patients experiencing VAs compared to 28% in the control group. Another study (n=220) found a 32% lower incidence of appropriate ICD shocks in the empagliflozin group (14% vs. 21%). ATP interventions were also reduced by 29% in empagliflozin-treated patients. Empagliflozin was also associated with improved heart rate variability parameters; a 22% reduction in late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI, and lower serum biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis, including galectin-3 and ST2 as reported by EMPEROR-Preserved trial.

Empagliflozin is associated with a lower incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 463 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free