Evidence Hub

Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Study Evaluating the Tolerance and Utility of the BRAVO Wireless pH Monitoring

Leonel Rodriguez, A. Morley-Fletcher, H. Winter, T. Buie

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition - JPGN, 2022

172 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Children on the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may express pain or discomfort through stereotypic or self-injurious behaviors. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may be challenging to diagnose in a child who is non-verbal or has impaired communication skills, diagnostic testing for GERD may be the only way to establish the diagnosis. We report our experience using the BRAVO wireless pH monitoring device for the evaluation of GERD in this patient population. Methods: Tolerance and feasibility as well as pH parameters and symptom correlation of the BRAVO pH were evaluated retrospectively in ASD children and compared it to a large cohort of non-ASD children. Only patients with studies lasting >24 hours were included. Results: A total of 172 patients were included, 27 of those were diagnosed with autism (median age 11 years, 17 male). We found no difference in age and weight between both groups but there was a male predominance in the autism group (P = 0.007). We found no difference in the ability to complete at least 24 hours of study duration between both groups (24/27 or 89% in ASD vs 133/145 or 92% non-ASD patients, P = 0.632). We also found no difference in the median reflux index on the worst day (P = 0.27) or the average of both days (P = 0.75), BRAVO pH parameters and the proportion of abnormal studies between ASD and non-ASD children. When evaluating the overall symptom correlation with GER episodes, we did not find a difference between both groups, but…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 172 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free