Evidence Hub

Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair with Consecutive Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Jennifer M. Kolb, M. Canto, Brett Parker, Michael j. Murray, Olaya I. Brewer Gutierrez, R. Sharaiha, Barham AbuDayyeh, Peter Janu et al.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2026

188 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with consecutive transoral incisionless fundoplication (cTIF) offers a combined endoscopic surgical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but data integrating symptom response with objective physiologic outcomes remain limited.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective multicenter registry of patients with BMI 50% reduction in GERD-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score within 12 months. Secondary endpoints included reflux symptom index (RSI) normalization, esophageal acid exposure normalization by pH testing or discontinued/rare proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Among 188 patients (mean hiatal hernia 3 cm), clinical success was achieved in 92%. GERD-HRQL improvement occurred in 90%, and RSI normalized in 84%. Daily PPI use was discontinued in 84%. Objective testing demonstrated normalization of esophageal acid exposure in 84% and DeMeester score in 85%. Patient satisfaction increased from 6% preoperatively to 75% postoperatively. Median length of stay was 23 hours [IQR 16-25]. Three serious adverse events occurred (1.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

cTIF achieves high rates of symptom improvement, PPI discontinuation, and normalization of esophageal acid exposure with low morbidity, supporting its role as an effective strategy for selected patients with GERD.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 188 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free