Evidence Hub

Evaluation of esophageal pathology in a group of patients 2 years after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) - Cohort study

Michał Szymański, I. Marek, Maciej Wilczyński, A. Janczy, J. Bigda, Ł. Kaska, M. Proczko-Stepaniak

Obesity Research and Clinical Practice, 2021

16 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a well established surgical procedure for morbid obesity. There are ongoing speculations and a debate regarding biliary reflux (BR) following OAGB. Studies considered OAGB as a risk for symptomatic and asymptomatic BR and marginal ulceration. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophagitis in microscopic and macroscopic evaluations among post OAGB patients diagnosed by means of upper endoscopy (UE) with a mucosal biopsy, and to assess the influence of comorbidities and medical history on endoscopic findings.

METHODS

Patients operated between 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2017 were schedule, two years after OAGB for UE with a biopsy. In all cases, biopsies from the distal esophagus were obtained. All patients received a validated GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire to assess their current symptoms.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were finally enrolled in the study. Twenty-four (48%) had grade A or B esophagitis. Four patients (8%) had endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia (ESEM). 34/50 (68%) patients had various histopathological esophageal changes, based on the conducted endoscopy, among which four cases of Barrett's esophagus were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high rates of esophagitis in our cohort, most of the patients did not report any symptoms which confirm the thesis of the essential role of asymptomatic bile reflux following OAGB.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free