Evidence Hub

Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

Sultanbaeva Nargiza, Mukhamedova Shohista, Umarova Shakhnoz, Mullabaeva Guzal

Current Cardiology Reviews, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin in patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (CHFpEF) and moderately reduced ejection fraction (CHFmrEF) across various healthcare systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2024 guidelines. A total of 6 studies were included after screening 225 records from PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Studies evaluating cost-effectiveness outcomes, including incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and healthcare costs, were analyzed.

RESULTS

All included studies applied a Markov model over a 10-year time horizon. Empagliflozin was associated with a 15-18% reduction in hospitalizations, an increase in QALYs by 0.11-0.67, and ICERs ranging from €5,089/QALY to $174,053/QALY, depending on the healthcare setting and model assumptions. Examples include: Spain: €5,089/QALY, China: $11,292/QALY, USA: $25,974-$174,053/QALY, Australia: A$29,202/QALY. ICER per life year (LY) ranged from $6,246 to $151,929, indicating variable cost-effectiveness based on country-specific cost structures and thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin appears to be a cost-effective add-on therapy to standard care for CHFpEF and CHFmrEF, especially in healthcare systems with high hospitalization costs. However, its value is highly sensitive to drug pricing and national willingness-to-pay thresholds. Further real-world…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free