Evidence Hub

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and psychoemotinal status: a cross-sectional study

I. D. Managadze, E. S. Pyatigorets, M. A. Stepanova, S. Glukhova, P. I. Mironova, A. I. Shaderkina, I. A. Tarasova, A. Shestakov et al.

Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology, 2026

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a multifactorial condition characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, leading to bothersome symptoms and potentially serious complications. The mechanisms underlying lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction and hiatal hernia formation in GERD remain insufficiently understood. It is plausible that esophageal motility disorders and visceral hypersensitivity are influenced by alterations in the central, autonomic, and enteric nervous systems, particularly in the context of elevated stress levels commonly observed among students. Objective. To evaluate the role of psychoemotional status in the development of GERD symptoms in university students. Material and methods. The study included 157 students from higher education institutions in the Russian Federation. Participants completed an online questionnaire comprising the GerdQ, HADS, Spielberger-Hanin State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Chalder Fatigue Scale. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate covariance analysis. Results. Based on the GerdQ screening tool, 19.7% of respondents demonstrated symptoms suggestive of GERD. A statistically significant association was observed between GERD symptoms and (1) high anxiety according to HADS, (2) elevated situational anxiety (p=0.005), (3) fatigue severity on the Chalder scale (p<0.001), (4) depressive symptoms on HADS (p=0.017), and (5) the combination of high trait anxiety (Spielberger-Hanin) with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free