Evidence Hub

Gene expression profiling of inflammatory cytokines in esophageal biopsies of different phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cross-sectional study

M. Zavala-Solares, G. Fonseca-Camarillo, M. Valdovinos, J. Granados, G. Grajales-Figueroa, L. Zamora-Nava, N. Aguilar-Olivos, L. Valdovinos-García et al.

BMC Gastroenterology, 2020

82 participants · 31 citations

Abstract

Background The clinical endoscopic phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are classified as Barrett's esophagus (BE), erosive esophagitis (EE) and non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD). NERD is subclassified as abnormal acid exposure (AAE) and normal acid exposure (NAE) based on pH monitoring study results. The aim of this study was to characterize genes involved in the pathophysiology and immune response of GERD. Methods This is an observational and cross-sectional study. All patients with BE, EE, AAE, and NAE and a control group were subjected to superior endoscopy (with biopsies of esophageal mucosa). Relative mRNA quantification of cytokine and target genes was conducted by quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR). Changes in the expression of genes associated with inflammation were assessed for each disease phenotype. Statistical analysis of differential gene expression was performed using the Mann–Whitney U non-parametric test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 82 patients were included and were divided into the following groups: Group BE, 16 (19.51%); Group EE, 23 (28.04%); Group AAE, 13 (15.86%); NAE 13 (15.86%); and Control Group, 17 (20.73%). Compared with the control group, patients with BE exhibited increased IL-8 expression ( p < 0.05) and increased levels of IL-10, MMP-3, and MMP-9. Patients with EE exhibited increased levels of IL-1B, IL-6 and IL-10 ( p < 0.05), and patients with AAE exhibited…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 82 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free