Evidence Hub

Somatic symptom disorder in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a key factor contributing to severe symptoms and impaired quality of life

Ya Jiang, Li Gao, Weichen Liu, Yu-Rong Tang

Frontiers in Medicine, 2026

209 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background Somatic symptom disorder (SSD) is a common yet frequently overlooked comorbidity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), compromising quality of life (QOL) and increasing healthcare utilization. Aims This study aimed to evaluate its impacts of SSD on symptom perception and QOL and to determine the risk factors for SSD in GERD patients. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary gastroenterology department. A total of 209 GERD patients completed validated questionnaires assessing reflux symptoms, somatic symptoms, anxiety, depression, sleep quality, and QOL. SSD was diagnosed based on DSM-5 criteria. All patients underwent upper endoscopy and a subset completed esophageal manometry and 24-h pH-impedance monitoring investigations. Results The proportion of SSD was 30.14% (63/209). Despite having milder objective reflux burden on 24-h pH-impedance monitoring and esophageal manometry, patients with SSD reported higher reflux symptom scores [GerdQ: 9(5) vs. 8(4), p = 0.032; RSI: 12(9) vs. 4(6), p < 0.001], more severe anxiety and depression, worse sleep quality (all p < 0.001), and lower QOL [GIQLI: 94(37) vs. 121(27.5), p < 0.001] than non-SSD patients. Female gender, laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms, anxiety, and depression were independent risk factors for SSD. SSD partially mediated the negative impacts of reflux symptoms and poor sleep on QOL (23.52% for GerdQ, 26.30% for RSI and 14.05% for PSQI). The PHQ-15 demonstrated high…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 209 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free