Evidence Hub

Relationship of Gastroesophageal Flap Valve with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Assessed Based on GerdQ Scores and Endoscopic Images

Andi Fithrani Neilufar, Fardah Akil, Nu'man A. S. Daud, S. Bakri, H. Rasyid, H. Kasim, A. Aman, A. Seweng

Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2022

100 participants

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition where reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms or complications. The gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) is one of the protective structures against esophageal reflux. This study aimed to determine the relationship between GEFV, measured by Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ) scores, and the endoscopic features of GERD patients.

Method: This observational cross-sectional study was performed at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital Makassar from August 2021 to October 2021. The participants were GERD patients who met the inclusion criteria. They were diagnosed using GerdQ scores and endoscopic features based on the Los Angeles criteria. The GEFV was assessed using retroflection endoscopy according to Hill’s criteria. Data analysis used SPSS version 25. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess data normality, along with the Chi-square test and calculation of odds ratio (OR). The results of the statistical tests were significant if p<0.05.

Results: This study included 100 GERD patients: 49 men and 51 women. They had a mean age of 40.5±12.8 years and a mean body mass index of 22.4±3.8 kg/m2. Abnormal GEFV was a risk for a GerdQ score of ≥8 compared to <8 (OR 4.56; 95% CI 1.53–13.52). Both normal and abnormal GEFV in esophagitis reflux were higher than in non-erosive reflux disease (p=0.943).

Conclusion: Abnormal GEFV was a risk factor for GERD based on a GerdQ score of 8, at 4.56 times…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free