Evidence Hub

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, juxtaposing the control of glycemia and blood pressure between large dose empagliflozin and placebo among type 1 diabetes patients

S. Saha, Sujata Saha

International Journal of Health Sciences, 2020

10 citations

Abstract

Objectives: While empagliflozin (25 mg) is used to treat type-2 diabetes mellitus patients with optimum renal functioning, its efficacy and safety in type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is not yet established. Therefore, this study aimed to compare insulin-treated T1DM patients’ (with adequate renal functioning) glycemic and blood pressure control between the 25 mg empagliflozin recipients and placebo recipients. Methods: Parallel-arm randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of daily administered 25 mg empagliflozin tablets in adjunct to insulin treatment with placebo and insulin treatment in T1DM patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more were eligible for inclusion. Trials were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL with no restriction on date and language. Risk of bias of trials was assessed and mean and standard deviation of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c, in %), systolic blood pressure (mmHg), and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) at the end of the trial period were collected, and random-effects meta-analysis was done to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD). The meta-analysis was done in Stata statistical software. This study was conducted in June 2019. Results: Three relatively small-sized trials published between 2015 and 2018 were eligible for review and analyses. The trials suffered from unclear risk of performance and detection bias. The HbA1c reduction favored the intervention group (WMD = −0.478, 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free