Evidence Hub

423. robotic surgery for benign esophageal disease: promosing outcomes of an early case series

K. Saliaris, I. Karikis, Panagiotis Varsos, S. Smparounis, D. Linardoutsos, Sofia Katsila, N. Pachos, A. Theodorou et al.

Diseases of the esophagus, 2024

13 participants

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery is a well-established approach in the treatment of benign gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) disease. Robotic platforms have only recently been incorporated in surgery for esophageal motility disorders and their exact value remains to be determined. In the present study, we present our initial experience through a case series of patients with benign GEJ disease treated using the DaVinciXi robotic system in our department.

Patients undergoing surgery for benign GEJ disease during the last 5 years (01/2029-12/2023) were prospectively collected. Data regarding their perioperative and postoperative course was evaluated. All patients attended regular follow-up appointments. Patients with relapse or deterioration of their symptoms were referred for objective testing using high-resolution manometry or 24-h impedance pHmetry.

12 patients with achalasia were subjected to robotic Heller myotomy and modified Dor fundoplication, 13 patients underwent hiatal hernia repair and 2 patients underwent Nissen fundoplication due to severe reflux. Median operative time was 110min (96-150) and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. All patients demonstrated resolution of their symptoms, with a median postoperative Eckardt score of 2 for patients with achalasia and median GERD score of 1 for patients with GERD. 2 patients with achalasia were subjected to impedance manometry due to temporary symptom relapse, without any abnormal findings.

The incorporation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free