Evidence Hub

The two-hit hypothesis in acute esophageal necrosis: black esophagus in severe atherosclerosis and untreated gastroesophageal reflux disease: a case report

Sushrut Ingawale, P. Vallivedu, A. Chauhan, Jack Jacob, Asim Haider, Prabin Sharma

Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2026

Abstract

Background Acute esophageal necrosis, also known as “black esophagus,” is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening condition marked by diffuse circumferential necrosis of the esophageal mucosa. It typically presents with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, such as hematemesis or melena, in 85–90% of reported cases. Acute esophageal necrosis is often multifactorial in etiology and associated with underlying comorbidities including cardiovascular disease and esophageal mucosal injury. Owing to its rarity, atypical presentations of acute esophageal necrosis can delay diagnosis and appropriate management. This case is noteworthy for its nonclassical presentation and its support of the “two-hit” hypothesis for acute esophageal necrosis pathogenesis. Case presentation A 71-year-old African American male with a medical history of coronary artery disease and untreated gastroesophageal reflux disease presented with odynophagia, epigastric discomfort, and nonradiating chest pain. He notably denied hematemesis or melena. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed extensive circumferential black discoloration of the distal esophageal mucosa consistent with necrosis, along with duodenal ulcers. Biopsy findings confirmed the diagnosis of acute esophageal necrosis along with evidence of Candida infection. The patient was treated conservatively with intravenous proton pump inhibitors (esomeprazole), oral fluconazole, and sucralfate. A repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed after several…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free