Evidence Hub

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors for Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

Zainab Imtiaz, Filagot D Eshete, Laaraib Arshad, Shwetha Gopal, Muhammad Siddiqui, Tope Mwuese Anyiman, Oluwatoyin Ayo-Farai, Terwase Anyiman et al.

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 2024

3,352 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have recently drawn attention as a viable therapy for acute heart failure (AHF). Despite this, a comprehensive synthesis of current research has not been undertaken.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this systematic review evaluated eight studies involving 3,352 participants. The scope encompassed research from the last twenty years, focusing on the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in AHF management. Detailed considerations regarding the temporal context and heterogeneity were incorporated into the methodology.

Results: The utilization of SGLT2 inhibitors yielded compelling results in improving cardiovascular outcomes, showcasing a substantial 58.2% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and a noteworthy 15% decrease in NT-proBNP levels. Empagliflozin therapy, specifically, exhibited enhanced clinical efficacy, as indicated by a 48% improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score. Furthermore, a detailed analysis revealed that markers of acute kidney injury witnessed a significant reduction after the administration of empagliflozin. This reduction reached statistical significance after 3 days of treatment (P=0.02) and persisted through the 7-day assessment (P=0.003). This comprehensive exploration of the results provides a more nuanced understanding of the multifaceted benefits associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,352 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free