Evidence Hub

When Stents Go Astray, We Find a Way: A Case Report on Retrieving a Migrated Esophageal Stent

Vinayak Venu, Girish Bakhshi, A. Dutt, Apoorva Raichur, Naman Jaiswal

Cureus, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

Benign esophageal strictures are characterized by the narrowing of the esophageal passage due to fibrotic changes. These strictures can arise from various causes, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, which leads to peptic strictures; surgical procedures causing esophageal injury, resulting in anastomotic strictures; radiation therapy, ingestion of corrosive substances, or endoscopic resection. Approximately 10% of benign esophageal strictures do not respond to conventional dilation therapy, prompting the consideration of temporary stent insertion as an alternative treatment approach. However, only about one-third of patients with refractory benign esophageal strictures experience sustained relief from dysphagia following self-expanding stent placement. Challenges such as stent migration and hyperplastic tissue response pose limitations to the effectiveness of this intervention. The utilization of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) in benign esophageal diseases is not standard practice due to the associated risks of adverse events such as tissue ingrowth at the uncovered portions, migration, and bleeding. One of the major challenges encountered is the growth of hyperplastic tissue around the stent during retrieval and subsequent serial esophageal bougie dilations. Long-term self-bougie dilations, coupled with the patient's gained self-confidence, played a crucial role in the management. While most migrated esophageal metallic stents are typically left in the stomach,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free