Evidence Hub

DOZ047.113: Outcome of routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and pH-(impedance) measurement in esophageal atresia patients according to international guidelines

M. van Lennep, U. Krishnan, M. V. van Wijk

Diseases of the esophagus, 2019

47 participants

Abstract

Evidence-based guideline recommendations for follow-up of patients with esophageal atresia (EA) include regular surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsies and a pH(-impedance) measurement (pH-MII) to evaluate gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in asymptomatic patients. In addition, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is considered useful to assess esophageal dysmotility. Additional testing is recommended when symptoms are present. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic and clinical yield of these tests.

All EA patients who underwent EGD, pH-MII, and HRM according to EA guideline recommendations in 2017 and 2018 were included.

Seventy-eight patients (53% male, 78% type C, median age 5 (0–17) years) were included. Thirty-one patients had EGD (n = 30), pH-MII (n = 11), and/or HRM (n = 7) as part of a routine surveillance program. Forty-seven patients had EGD (n = 47), pH-MII (n = 26), and HRM (n = 9) for symptom evaluation. Symptoms at the time of testing included dysphagia (51%), regurgitation (41%), and heartburn (24%). Results and consequences of the surveillance and clinically indicated tests are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Macroscopic EGD findings included stricture (21%), signs of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE, 3%), and signs of reflux esophagitis (3%). Histological findings included EoE (13%) and reflux esophagitis (17%). Clinical implications of EGD results included medication alteration (GERD/EoE), esophageal dilation, antireflux surgery, or…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free